By Dr. Shweta Agarwal, MBBS, DGO Medical content reviewed by Dr. Shweta Agarwal, MBBS, DGO Last updated: July 2026
This page is educational. It summarises the published positions of named institutions, each of which is listed with its source at the end. It is not a fatwa, not religious guidance, and not legal advice. Religious questions belong to religious authorities; legal questions to lawyers; clinical decisions depend on your individual medical facts.
Published by Aansh Hospital & IVF Center, Chandrapur — a government-registered Level-2 ART clinic (Reg. No. MH/AC/2024/15441/L2/Chandrapur/132) with its embryology lab on-site.
Couples ask us this question quietly, often at the end of a consultation, after the medical plan has already been explained. It deserves a straight, sourced answer. So this page does one thing carefully: it records who said what, when, with each institution named — and then, separately, what Indian law allows. Where scholars disagree, we say so rather than picking a side.
Is IVF halal in Islam?
The most specific and most widely cited ruling is Resolution 16 (4/3) of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy (Jeddah), passed at its third session in Amman, Jordan, 11–16 October 1986. It examines seven methods one by one.
Five are declared prohibited, all of them because they introduce someone outside the marriage and, in the Academy's words, produce "the confusion of parenthoods":
- The husband's sperm with a donor egg, transferred to the wife
- Donor sperm with the wife's egg, transferred to the wife
- The couple's own embryo carried by a surrogate
- Two strangers' gametes, transferred to the wife
- The couple's own embryo carried by a co-wife
Two are held to carry no Shariah restriction "in case of necessity", provided the necessary precautions are taken:
- The wife's egg fertilised in the laboratory by her husband's sperm, then transferred to her own womb — that is, conventional IVF or ICSI for a married couple
- The husband's sperm placed into his wife's reproductive tract — that is, IUI
Note the word necessity. The permission in that resolution is framed as a response to a real medical difficulty, not as a general licence.
What do Islamic scholars say about IVF — the timeline of named positions
A published review of Islamic perspectives on assisted reproduction (NCBI Bookshelf, Assisted Reproductive Technology: Islamic Perspective) records the following sequence. Each row is that review's account of the body named.
| Body | When | Position as recorded |
|---|---|---|
| Dar al-Ifta, Cairo — fatwa of Shaykh Gad al-Haq Ali Gad al-Haq (later Shaykh al-Azhar) | 23 March 1980 | The earliest widely cited Sunni permission: IVF within an intact marriage, with no third party intruding into the marital functions of sex and procreation |
| Islamic Organization for Medical Sciences (IOMS), Kuwait | 1983 | Endorsed assisted-reproduction guidelines on the same basis |
| Islamic Fiqh Council, Makkah (Muslim World League) | 1984, reversed 1985 | Briefly allowed surrogacy between co-wives of one husband; withdrew that approval the following year |
| International Islamic Fiqh Academy, Resolution 16 (4/3), Amman | 11–16 October 1986 | The seven-method resolution set out above |
| International Islamic Fiqh Academy | 1990 (1410 AH) | Addressed surplus fertilised ova: only the number to be transferred should be fertilised; any surplus fertilised ova should be left without assistance until they perish; a woman's fertilised ovum must not be placed in another woman's uterus |
| IOMS conference, Casablanca | 1997 | Prohibited all situations in which a third party enters the marital relationship |
| Islamic Fiqh Council, Muslim World League, Makkah | November 2007 | Banned sex selection carried out for social reasons |
Alongside the councils, individual scholars have attached conditions. The Saudi fatwa portal IslamQA, in answer 98604 (drawing on Shaykh 'Abd-Allah al-Jibrin and the Standing Committee), counsels avoiding IVF "to be on the safe side", and where it discusses permissibility it attaches conditions: genuine necessity rather than a year or two of disappointment; not being examined by male staff where qualified female staff are available; caution about how the semen sample is obtained; caution about storing gametes or embryos; the gametes being the couple's own; and confidence in the laboratory handling them. That is one answer from one portal — not a consensus — and other scholars have reasoned differently on several of those points, particularly on sample collection where there is medical need.
The recurring anxiety in all of these texts is not the technology. It is nasab — lineage — and the fear that samples could be confused. That part is a laboratory question, and we answer it below.
"IVF treatment jaiz hai ya nahi?"
Yeh sawaal sabse zyada isi tarah poocha jaata hai, to seedha jawab yahan hai — hamara nahi, unka jo councils upar named hain.
Jin Sunni councils ka zikr upar hai — 1980 ka Cairo fatwa aur 1986 ki Islamic Fiqh Academy Resolution 16 (4/3) — unke mutabiq, agar sperm shauhar ka ho, egg biwi ka ho, nikah qaayam ho, aur embryo usi biwi ke rahm mein wapas jaaye, to zaroorat ki soorat mein ismein koi Shariah rukawat nahin batayi gayi. Aur agar kisi teesre shakhs ka sperm, egg ya rahm shaamil ho, to unhi rulings mein use na-jaiz kaha gaya hai.
India mein Darul Ifta, Darul Uloom Deoband ka jawab number 9514 bhi isi taraf hai: shauhar ke sperm aur biwi ke egg se rahm ke baahar fertilisation sirf sakht zaroorat aur majboori ki soorat mein jaiz batlaya gaya, aur us se paida hone wala bachcha jaiz (legitimate) qaraar diya gaya.
Lekin ye faisla aapke aalim ka hai, hamara nahin. Apne mufti ko apni poori medical tafseel likh kar bhejiye.
Is IVF allowed in Islam for Hanafi couples in India?
Most Indian Muslims follow the Hanafi school, and the bodies people here actually write to are Indian — the Darul Ifta of Darul Uloom Deoband, the Islamic Fiqh Academy (India) in New Delhi (established 1988), and local muftis attached to a mosque or madrasa.
Two published Deoband answers illustrate why the framing of your question matters:
- Answer 9514 responded to a questioner who specified in-vitro fertilisation using the husband's sperm and the wife's eggs after other means of reproduction had failed. The reply: it is allowable only in cases of exigency and severe need, and the child born of it is legitimate.
- An answer bearing reference 1246/1246=M/1429, responding to a question that combined surrogacy and test-tube baby together, replied simply that "both things are unlawful."
We are not the right people to reconcile those two answers, and we will not try. What we can point out is procedural: a fatwa answers the question it was asked. If you write to your darul ifta, set out the specifics — the diagnosis, that the gametes would be your own, that the marriage is intact, what has already been tried — so that the answer you receive addresses your actual situation.
Is IVF or IUI halal?
Resolution 16 (4/3) treated both together, and what decided the ruling was whose sperm and whose egg — not which technique. Method 7 (the husband's sperm placed into his wife) and method 6 (the couple's own gametes fertilised in the lab and transferred to the wife) were the two held to carry no Shariah restriction in case of necessity. Where donor sperm or a donor egg is used, that resolution places the procedure in the prohibited group whether the technique is IUI or IVF.
Medically the two are not interchangeable: how we decide between IUI and IVF depends on tubal patency, sperm parameters, ovarian reserve and how long you have been trying. That is a clinical judgement, and it is separate from the religious one.
Where Sunni and Shia positions diverge: third-party donation
This is the biggest difference in the literature, and it is entirely about donation.
Sunni councils — as recorded above, from 1980 through 2007 — have consistently placed donor sperm, donor eggs and surrogacy in the prohibited category, on the ground that they confuse lineage.
Shia authorities differ among themselves, and they differ in ways that a single sentence cannot capture. The same published review records Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as having issued a fatwa in the late 1990s permitting third-party donation, including egg donation, sperm donation and surrogacy, under specified conditions — which is part of why donor treatment developed in Iran as it did not elsewhere in the region. It records Ayatollah Sistani as opposing third-party donation, and Shaykh Muhammad Husayn Fadlallah as differing on sperm donation specifically.
But summaries flatten things. The English question-and-answer section of Ayatollah Sistani's own office states that where the sperm and egg belong to the husband and wife and the fertilised egg is then implanted in another woman's womb, "there is no problem. It is permissible per se" — while restricting this to situations where the couple would otherwise face difficulty "which is not normally bearable", and noting that the owner of the sperm is the legal father with precaution required on inheritance.
That gap between a summary and the marja's own words is exactly why, in Shia jurisprudence, the answer depends on the living marja you follow — and why no clinic, and no article, can settle it for you.
What Indian law allows — a separate question from what is permitted religiously
This is the part missing from nearly everything written online about IVF and Islam, and it matters far more to a couple in Chandrapur or Nagpur than the law of Egypt or Turkey does.
India's Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, with the ART Rules 2022, the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 and the PCPNDT Act 1994, decides what a clinic here may lawfully do. Religious permissibility is decided elsewhere. Keep the two columns apart:
| Scenario | Indian law (ART Act 2021 unless stated) | Position recorded for the named scholarly bodies |
|---|---|---|
| IVF/ICSI with husband's sperm + wife's egg, transferred to the wife | Permitted; §21(g) allows ART services for a woman above 21 and below 50, and a man above 21 and below 55 | No Shariah restriction in case of necessity — IIFA Res. 16 (4/3), 1986; Deoband answer 9514 (exigency and severe need) |
| IUI with the husband's sperm | Permitted | Same as above |
| Donor sperm or donor egg | Lawful, but only sourced through a registered ART bank (§27), with statutory confidentiality of patient and donor information (§21(e)); selling, purchasing or trading gametes or embryos is an offence (§33) | Prohibited by the Sunni councils recorded above; Shia positions differ by marja |
| Surrogacy | Altruistic only; commercial surrogacy prohibited; eligibility, certification and approvals rest with the statutory authorities under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021, not with any clinic | Prohibited in Res. 16 (4/3); the Makkah Council's 1984 co-wife allowance was withdrawn in 1985; Ayatollah Sistani's office states it is permissible per se with the couple's own gametes in unbearable hardship |
| Choosing the baby's sex | Illegal. §26 prohibits offering a child of a predetermined sex or identifying the sex of an in-vitro embryo, except to diagnose, prevent or treat a sex-linked disorder; the PCPNDT Act applies alongside. §32 separately makes advertising sex-selective ART punishable with 5–10 years' imprisonment, or a fine of ₹10–25 lakh, or both | Sex selection for social reasons banned by the Muslim World League's Islamic Fiqh Council, November 2007 |
| Freezing gametes or embryos | Lawful, but §22(2) requires specific written consent from all parties, including instructions for the event of death or incapacity | Contested. The IIFA's 1990 ruling directed that only the number to be transferred should be fertilised and that surplus fertilised ova be left to perish; IslamQA answer 98604 counsels against storage; other scholars permit it within a marriage |
Two things follow.
Legality is not permission. Donor IVF is lawful in India. The Sunni councils recorded above prohibit it. If your scholar's position is that donor gametes are closed to you, tell your doctor at the first consultation rather than at the end of a workup — it changes which investigations and which treatment options are worth your time and money, and it spares you from being counselled toward a path you would never take.
Sex selection is not available in India at any price. It is a criminal matter, not a preference. Any clinic offering it is committing an offence. PGT-A screens embryos for aneuploidy; the sex of an embryo is not disclosed, and the Act's only exception concerns sex-linked disease.
The practical questions Muslim couples ask our clinic
These are the ones no article on this topic seems to answer.
"Can we be seen by a female doctor?" Dr. Shweta Agarwal is a woman and leads consultations, scans and the transfer procedure. If you would like a female attendant present as well, say so when you book and we will arrange it.
"How do you make sure the sample is ours?" This is the nasab concern behind almost every cautious fatwa, and it is answered by laboratory practice, not by scripture. Our embryology lab is on-site in Chandrapur rather than at a distant facility, so samples are not transported between buildings; identity is checked and witnessed at the points where material moves between vessels. If it would settle your mind, ask us to walk you through the witnessing steps in person — we are glad to. Why an on-site lab matters explains the wider reasoning.
"Do we have to freeze embryos?" Not in every case — whether a fresh or a frozen transfer is better depends on your response to stimulation, your endometrium and other individual factors, and your doctor will explain the reason in your case. What matters here is timing: if freezing raises a religious concern for you, raise it before the cycle is planned, because it affects choices that have to be made in advance. Consent for stored material, including what happens in the event of death or incapacity, is documented as the ART Act requires.
"Can we do a cycle during Ramadan?" Tell us your intentions before we plan the cycle. Injection and scan timings can often be discussed and adjusted around your routine, though this depends on the protocol and on how your ovaries respond, so nothing can be promised in advance. Whether treatment affects your fast, and whether an exemption applies to you, is a question for your scholar and not for us.
"Should only my wife be tested?" No — and this is the most common and most costly assumption we see. A male factor is a frequent contributor to a couple's infertility and is easily missed when only the wife is investigated. A semen analysis is simple, quick and inexpensive, and should be part of the first round of tests for every couple. ASRM guidance suggests evaluating a couple after twelve months of trying without success, or after six months where the woman is 35 or older — and sooner where there is a known reason to.
A few terms, in Urdu
Families often discuss all this in Urdu at home even when the reports are in English.
- Infertility (بے اولادی) — not conceiving after twelve months of regular trying without contraception, or six months if the wife is 35 or older. Primary means never having conceived; secondary means having conceived before but not now.
- IVF (آئی وی ایف) — the egg is fertilised by sperm in the laboratory and the resulting embryo is transferred into the uterus. Commonly called test tube baby.
- ICSI — a single sperm is injected directly into an egg; used mainly for male-factor problems.
- IUI — washed sperm is placed directly into the uterus around the time of ovulation.
- Embryo transfer (منتقلیِ جنین) — placing the embryo into the uterus; a brief outpatient step.
If it would be easier to have the whole consultation in Urdu or Hindi, tell us when you book. Our team consults in Marathi, Hindi and English every day and we will make sure the conversation happens in the language you think in.
Where these positions come from
Every religious position on this page is quoted from one of the following. We have not paraphrased any of them into a ruling of our own.
- International Islamic Fiqh Academy, Resolution 16 (4/3), third session, Amman, 11–16 October 1986 — official text
- International Islamic Fiqh Academy, 1990 (1410 AH), on surplus fertilised ova
- Assisted Reproductive Technology: Islamic Perspective — NCBI Bookshelf review, for the timeline of councils and the record of Shia positions
- M. Inhorn, Making Muslim babies: IVF and gamete donation in Sunni versus Shi'a Islam — PMC, for the 23 March 1980 Cairo fatwa
- Darul Ifta, Darul Uloom Deoband — answer 9514 (own-gamete IVF in exigency and severe need); answer reference 1246/1246=M/1429 (surrogacy and test-tube baby together)
- IslamQA, answer 98604
- Office of Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, English Q&A — artificial insemination
- Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 — sections 21, 22, 26, 27, 32, 33; ART Rules 2022; Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021; PCPNDT Act, 1994
Talk to us — and bring every question
You should not have to make the medical decision and the religious decision in the same conversation. Get the medical facts clearly, take them to the person you trust for religious guidance, and then decide at your own pace.
If you already have reports or a previous cycle to review, a free second opinion is available — we will go through the file honestly, including telling you when treatment is not indicated. Cost bands and 0% EMI options are published on our IVF cost page.
Call or WhatsApp +91 80056 85160, or visit us in Chandrapur. Tell us at the start if there are options you do not wish to consider on religious grounds. It does not offend us; it helps us plan properly.